ASICS Court FF 3 Clay 2026 – with a sleek new design
These tennis shoes / padel shoes are designed for players who compete on clay tennis courts or padel courts with a heavy sand surface. The herringbone-pattern outsole delivers exceptional grip on slippery courts. If you feel like you’re sliding around on court, this is the obvious choice for the best possible experience on both the tennis and padel court.
ASICS has fine-tuned the Court FF 3 into what it is today, and as many know, this is the very model Novak Djokovic uses on the tennis court thanks to its unique performance features. A stable, fast, and agile shoe for players who want nothing but the very best on the tennis or padel court.
The shoe’s FLYTEFOAM® midsole is 55% lighter and provides 76% better cushioning than standard midsoles, contributing to a lightweight and comfortable feel. In addition, the shoe is equipped with GEL® technology in both the forefoot and rearfoot to absorb impact at every step. Comfort is the key focus of the Court FF series, and this is why it is the only ASICS model featuring a MONO-SOCK™ fit, delivering an exceptionally close and secure fit.
The outsole is made from AHAR® rubber, a compound that provides outstanding durability and long-lasting performance.
Court FF 3 combines the best of both worlds, delivering an incredibly dynamic shoe with a smooth, responsive feel and superb stability. In our opinion, this is the most complete shoe on the market.
Color: White with green details (White/Aurora Green)
Technology & Materials
FLYTEFOAM™ technology – Provides lightweight cushioning and shock absorption
Forefoot GEL™ technology – Enhances impact absorption and creates a softer feel at foot strike
TWISTRUSS™ technology – Improves speed and cutting movements
PGUARD™ technology – Helps increase durability in the toe and heel areas of the outsole
MONO-SOCK™ construction – Helps improve stability and delivers a sock-like fit
AHARPLUS™ rubber outsole – Enhances durability
Sockliner manufacturing process – Reduces water usage by approximately 33% and CO₂ emissions by approximately 45% compared to conventional methods
